%0 Journal Article %J BMJ Open %D 2019 %T Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit. %A Price, Courtney %A Agarwal, Gina %A Chan, David %A Goel, Sanjeev %A Kaplan, Alan G %A Boulet, Louis-Philippe %A Mamdani, Muhammad M %A Straus, Sharon E %A Lebovic, Gerald %A Gupta, Samir %X

OBJECTIVES: Care gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours.

DESIGN: One-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit.

SETTING: Three family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS: 884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0±17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8±4.8 visits/patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0±8.6 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of: patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model.

RESULTS: Primary outcome: Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p=0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p<0.01).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p<0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p=0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered.

CONCLUSIONS: Major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01070095; Pre-results.

%B BMJ Open %V 9 %P e022506 %8 2019 01 29 %G eng %N 1 %R 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022506